35mm negative scanner reddit This was true of virtually all older scanners, but modern production cinema scanners often debayer. On Windows 10 it hangs… Nikon seemed to realize the slide/negative scanner market was going to be short lived and got out early, as their digital sensor sales increased. If you plan to scan medium format and 35mm, the V600 is a good entry scanner. Negative curl won't be a big problem unless you're doing some kind of photogrammetry. If you get a pro to scan your negs, make sure they're using this type of high-end equipment. Hello i'm looking for a 35mm negative scanner which should satisfy the following properties: No negative Holder / ability to insert the negative strip directly without mounting it first into any sort of holder. It will will also do 120 medium format (which they are way better at compared to 35mm). We want no dust, no fingerprints, no nothing - it would look bad on the scan. Or check it out in the app stores 35mm film negative scanners IET media lab . A scanner like the V800 can scan 4 strips of 35mm in a batch. Personally I would scan on this one only. Choosing the right 35mm film scanner can be a daunting task, especially when looking for the best 35mm film and slide scanner, the best 35mm film negative scanner, or simply the Best 35mm Film Scanner. This is for getting 36" x 24"H prints at 300dpi (or more, obviously). I know lots of people shit on flatbed scanners, but they are useful if you want to have one scanner that can accommodate both 35mm film and medium format film. An Epson V*** ranges from 150$ to 600$ on the used market. You don't value image top quality: if you just want to save some memories, but don't care about perfect quality, there are faster and cheaper scanners (see Kodaks below). They tend to be made using cell phone camera parts (i'm only partially joking). I thought about the Coolscan 5000 ED but they're going for at least 800€ and most of the time the APS adapter is missing. My good ol reliable GMYLE Smart Digital Image Copier has run its course. KODAK Mini Digital Film & Slide Scanner – Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to 22 Megapixel JPEG Images Edit: this may work depending on your cost to quality ratio Reply reply V550. I have retired my old Nikon 35mm scanner because I can get just as good (if not better) results by photographing the film with a digital camera (place the film in a negative holder over a light box). If not - flatbed scanner with film scanning attachment. I have problems with vuescan and the cs8000 scanner because it cannot recognise where each frame ends or starts and you have to manually enter the offsets. true. It’s a very nice and versatile scanner (you can also scan 110, 126 and APS with third party adapters). /r/Spokane protests in solidarity with our fellow Redditors who have Have loads of 35mm slides, stereo slides, and negatives of all formats. Can usually get one for ~300 or less. It’s also a great 35mm scanner. I am looking to buy a negative scanner that can enlarge a 35mm negative to a resolution of 11700 x 7800px. But now I am digging deeper into into some old negatives, some going back to the 1930s. TL;DR: advice needed! budget scanner around 200 eur for 35mm film for an amateur photographer hi reddit! I’ve only just started taking pictures on film (about 4 films in) but I’m already noticing how expensive scanning gets in my area (Hamburg, Germany). With the way that drug stores and such used to cut the strips afterwords, there are 4 per strip. I've actually gone ahead and gotten hands on the v850 pro, for the sake of its flexibility. It's still for sale and arguably one of the highest end, best resolving models on the market. 6x6 medium format negative captured as a 6 separate images which were stitched into a panorama before export from Lightroom as a DNG. Sep 2, 2022 · I used the Plustek 8200i to scan thousands of negatives and slides. It's not possibly to do this perfectly with just Lightroom or Photoshop controls, although a lot of people get by. The results are fantastic. For many Redditors with disabilities, 3rd party apps are the only way Reddit can be functionally accessed. I thrifted a cheap scanner but it turned out to be useless for anything other than having a quick look on new negatives. But you pay the price with it being the most difficult (and therefore most expensive) method to do so. You can put three film strips (I. You'll never get significantly more real resolution than about a 1200dpi scan out of a flatbed, even the Epson V700, the undisputed king of flatbed film scanners. It comes with negative holders for 35mm negatives, 35mm positive slides, and some others. You can buy a better-quality higher-resolution dedicated 35mm slide and negative scanner for less than you plan to spend on that transparency unit. Snag a Plustek Opticfilm scanner off ebay. Only time its trouble is when its under exposed, but you can see the spacing and make a good guess based on the sprocket holes with 35mm. Scan full rolls in 2 minutes or less. Drum scanning is by far the highest quality method to scan. The quality will be as good or better than even a high-resolution camera. You can scan 2 strips of like 6 frames at a time. I have taken some 35mm negs up to 16x20 with success. You’ll need to scan the large format negatives in halves and then stitch them together. I also have the Canon 9000 Mark II. Clean everything. The Nikon coolscan and the Minolta multi-scan are really good (at 4000 & 5000 dpi respectively) but they are not fast. Or check it out in the app stores How to properly expose/scan 35mm negatives with Vuescan on Plustek Afaik, this method won’t work since the scanner doesn’t have autofocus and the negatives have to be a few millimeters away from the glass itself. Their software and film holders prevent you from scanning full frame or off-sized negatives. DSLR cameras also take pictures significantly faster than most scanners scan. negative or positives) on it at a time. Flatbed scanning is usually reserved for medium format or larger, but the higher end Epson stuff does it fine. Getting sharp and focused images out of film with a scanner is the most difficult task for scanners, it seems, and it will massively cap the scan quality in a way that is impossible to compensate for in any way. Not really satisfied with how they're coming out of the lab. If you do it yourself, DO Buy a proper negative/ slide scanner. Tried the trays, direct on the scanner…just not great. Try and get a 7200i, 7600i or anything with an i. A couple other things, If you plan on buying vue scan and/or negative lab pro you'll need to subtract the costs of that from your budget. Has any Redditor out there had success with a USB based negative scanner? If so, which one and what software? TIA. I also cannot overstate how good your iPhone would be as a backlight for scanning negatives too. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 35 mm Negative Scanner Scanning Resolution of 35mm Film never ceases to amaze me! upvotes Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If you look up the model number you can find the optical resolution. If you are just scanning 120 and/or large format. We believe unilaterally prohibiting their participation on Reddit is Totes Not Cool™️. Nov 6, 2015 · If you shoot a lot of 35mm and/or you develop your own film at home, then it might be worth investing in a scanner. You need to get to the Epson V700 level for that. The scanner costs around $1149. Dslr scanning on 35mm works great, 6x45, 6x6, and 6x7 work pretty well. I do not have experience scanning negatives but I have scanned a few hundred normal/positive photos using VueScan. : panos) which are not possible with most dedicated scanners. However, even with a drum scanner it's difficult to get all that resolution - e. The key is to keep the negatives flat, which is impossible with the Epson filmholders. A flatbed is going to get about 6 megapixels of real resolution out of 35mm film, and the dedicated film scanners will give you more like 15 megapixels. Now that I no longer have access to my university's negative scanner, I've been looking into how I can scan my own 35mm negatives at home. Whatever you buy, find lots of reviews from knowledgeable users first. You also have to supply your own back light, and that's something you can control as well. Send photos you need in good quality out to be scanned, or save up for a real dedicated film scanner. Your scanner is designed for large format transparencies and so will only scan to 2400 x 4800 dpi, which is kinda ok for 35mm but not really. Scan cut strips or uncut rolls of 35mm film. Scan the borders/sprockets of your film with our optional 35mm Full Border Scanning Cassette (very popular look and unique to our product) Dec 11, 2024 · It’s a dedicated negative scanner. Unfortunately, a manufacturer can truthfully say that a scanner can record detail in dense film, when in fact the scanner records mostly noise. So I can scan 8 af a time. All of them (other than 3) have Index prints but they're so small that I don't think they're worth trying to scan. Slides are pretty easy since they are direct positives. In that particular order : 5000/4000/V or IV. You also get IR dust removal in many models which is a huge time saver. The V850 is more than 4x the price of the V600. My friend says it’s trash on 35mm but ok on 120. 35mm scans are definitely enough for social media. Took half an hour. About 30% of the time it will just advance to some wildly misaligned location, with the space between two negatives right in the center of the scanning area. Do not buy cheap ($50-200) boxy looking film scanners. Keeps film perfectly flat for sharp scans thanks to our improved double S curve channels in our film scanning cassettes. It really depends on the composition of the scene and the film you're using. It was a couple of years ago, and I used a canon 9950f, which could scan 30 negative frames at once. If you don’t have a digital camera and are only scanning 35mm I would probably just get a dedicated 35mm scanner. If all you need is to scan at enough resolution for the web, the Epsons will be fine. g. KODAK Mini Digital Film & Slide Scanner – Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to 22 Megapixel JPEG Images Edit: this may work depending on your cost to quality ratio Reply reply Drum scanning is by far the highest quality method to scan. r I got this SilverCrest SND 3600 A2 scanner from Lidl. Plus, you can scan 35mm slide film. It's a fantastic flatbed scanner for working with reflective paper materials. What should I be looking for would appreciate your advice and comments re scanners suitable for good end reproduction. That will get you the best quality without a bunch of made up pixels. Personally Epson scan has worked fine for me, but then again I’ve never tried anything else. I get much better results and much faster than I used to using dedicated film scanners and I can also scan odd formats/aspect ratios (i. Get the Reddit app only do reflective scanning and can’t scan transparencies or negatives. 35mm negative captured as a single image. Additionally, your example, even at websize is lacking sharpness and detail and 35mm was never intended for 20" prints. I'm trying to scan my 35mm negatives with my canon 5d MkII. Things get a bit more exciting when you introduce 120 -I have made excellent 1m x 1m prints from negatives form a Mamiya 6, scanning with a V700. Nov 23, 2020 · A flatbad scanner gives you the most options and delivers great quality for medium format and above. I don't want to spend more than 500 € for a scanner which should also be able to scan 35mm in high quality. (like it is the case with plusteq and other scanners) I need to convert about 10 years worth of 35mm film negatives to digital and all the scanners I can find online have generally the same comment; software does not really work with Macs. I consider buying a good scanner now but as with everything a bit more "niche" it's hard to find informed tests. It is a pricey choice. Neat trick I’ve been using that works wonders for me: Scan same negative 4 times (or however many times, just more than 4), each time moving the negative to a different location on the scanner bed, align and stack/average all files in photoshop (called “super resolution” or something in digital photography, works great for scanning film!!). Don't bother. The PrimeFilm XAs is a dedicated 35mm film scanner. I scanned a LOT of pictures in with my flat bed scanner, several hundred rolls. If you’re doing any 35mm, i recommend a dedicated 35mm scanner like an opticfilm 8200 Drum scanners, like most dedicated film scanners, have lower possible resolution the bigger the film you're scanning is. Not that that'd be necessary anyway. Very sharp scans and comes with silverfast scanning software which is really good. I scan depending on output. You’re not able to scan that many because the top “window” is smaller than the bottom bed because they’re negatives. See the first table in that link. SW can do auto correction of those areas. I’ve read that 120 is much better than 35mm on flatbed scanners bc the size of the negative compensates for the lower resolution, but unfortunately I’m still a bit far from buying my first medium format camera. But my scanner (Plustek 7400) goes up to 7200, and I scan at that resolution if I am printing. You can use the same set up to scan 120 film for incredible detail (you take multiple pictures of the negative and can easily stitch them together in photoshop, it does most of the work). Really on sharpness it’s just not there. Normally this would not be an issue, except that I shoot panoramic 35mm frames with my XPan. The v850 is significantly better both in terms of speed and native dpi/scan quality. Hi, Related Photography Photography (Reddit) Arts Meta/Reddit forward back. So it's not possible to drum scan 8x10" film at anywhere near the resolution you could scan 35mm film at. My setup for dslr scanning is a Nikon D800+tokina 100mm 2. Hope this helps. I think I would ideally like to use a macro lens with my Sony a7iii (rather than a scanner for quality purposes), but I do not have a macro lens. It will remove all dust, scratches, it comes with SilverFast, and can be fed an entire 36 exposure roll of film. How many of them do you need to scan? Do you have any camera gear? I yes than fastest and cheapest way is "dslr scanning". The optics are just not very advanced in flat bed scanners and their ability to resolve detail is nothing compared to that of a dedicated negative scanner or drum scanner. I have the PrimeFilm XAs for scanning my 35mm negatives which I use with Vuescan. I use an old Mac to run the coolscan software to scan with the Nikon 8000. But their scanners have optical scanning lenses they designed for the purpose. Also, depending on what format you shoot could affect the quality. 120 you just gotta guess I suppose. Plugins like Negative Lab Pro help. I think Vuscsan might be able to. . After extensive research and hands-on experience, I’ve narrowed down my top 5 specialized 35mm film scanners for 2023. The larger the format of film, the less the scanner matters because the film is so big. It took an enormous amount of time, so much that I bought a second scanner and ran them both in parallel for a month or so. I already tried putting the negatives between two pieces of glass and elevate them with paper to the required height, but I failed that miserably I've scanned thousands of slides and negatives and own commerical grade Noritsu and Pakon film scanners. It comes with two 35mm film strip holders. The colors appear super desaturated, the resolution is bad and i think the scanner lense is dirty. Takes forever and the files are huge though, but I need it for printing. The scanner comes with film holders. Its the perfection 3170; was The current crop of dedicated scanners still sold new are alright but not as popular. Hi, I have hundreds of b&w and color 35mm negatives to scan and would like to know if the V600 will do the job or if the v850 is needed. I've been scanning thousands of old negatives. You’d want an 8200. Alternative Photography process discussion is also welcome. Thanks! Yeah, my workflow is similar and the results have varied a bit. In IR, the slides/negatives are a constant, solid grey. A big help is Negative Lab Pro plugin for Lightroom, but there are lots of options and settings you have to decide on. All post-processing for both flatbed and DSLR images was done through Photoshop using the lab scans as a reference in an effort to closely match all comparison images. You could have a 200MP scan of a 35mm negative, but there won't be 200MP worth of detail in there. Text is readable, details are crisp and color is good. I want more control over my workflow and how my negatives look. I don't have negative holders for these. If you shoot a lot of 35mm and/or you develop your own film at home, then it might be worth investing in a scanner. It takes about 9 minutes after a bug patch. As for flat negatives I tried glass plates, cardboard cut out with weights but time consuming and the glass plates a nightmare to keep free of dust. So, on top of the price of the scanner itself, I bought Vuescan software ($99) and Negative Lab Pro ($99). I was hoping it would be similar, but it’s not even close. So you can easily adjust the settings as needed in case the negatives are a little darker or brighter than usual. Note: I have read that dedicated negative scanners (ie not flatbed) provide even better quality. If you intend to mostly scan 35mm color negative then the V600 isn't that great anymore, peaking at 1600 dpi. But flatbeds are just slower and limited in how much they can resolve on 35mm film. But if you do a lot of 6x9 or 6x17, a scanner will probably do you better, as you’ll have to significantly crop the scans on a dslr. That means you can’t scan prints. Nov 27, 2024 · Our experts pick the best film scanners that make it easier than ever to bring your old 35mm negatives and slides into the digital age A scanner like the V800 can scan 4 strips of 35mm in a batch. I have an Epson V850. Similarly, scenes that are rich in textures will st would the lide 300/400 be good for scanning film like 35mm. The scans will look the best if you scan the negative as raw as possible and use something else to invert and process it. The Plustek 35mm scanners (7400, 7600, 8100, 8200) are probably the best bang for the buck in that category. One thing to remember is that film doesn't have infinite resolution. They can do web-sized pictures, but generally do not have the true resolution to resolve grain. It has been - maybe 20 years since they made a scanner and they stopped software support with Windows 7. I scan using the native Canon software and simply put, the results match the negatives. Other Ever since I started to shoot film around 3 years ago I kept my negatives in case I'd buy a scanner in the future and scan them in better quality myself - now I got the Plustek Opticfilm and started to scan them, and I also want to sort and archive them. For a flatbed, I wouldn't get anything less than an Epson V700/750, which will get you good scans from medium format (120 film) and large format (sheet film), and decent scans of 35mm film. The included Epson Scan software is easy to use. e. Color negative is hard because typically no cameras or consumer scanners have the right spectral sensitivities for it, and scans need to be post-processed to correct this. I have none of the setups and looking for a way into DSLR scanning. For dedicated 35mm, Plustek will be the most common option. r/AskPhotography. At that price point, you can get better dedicated 35mm scanners. Before anyone yells at me: Yes, I know it will turn out grainy, and no I don't want to work with larger format film. Most 7200 dpi film scanners are closer to 3800-4000 in reality, but this will capture most of the info on a 35mm piece of film. With higher end flatbed scanners, like the Epson V800/850, you can get really good results even on 35mm. A flatbed scanner will work, and will be much better than the dirt cheap ($40) 35mm negative scanners that are basically a smart phone camera in a box, but some people feel the quality of a flatbed is still too soft and want something higher quality like a drum scan or a flextight scan. My set-up consisted of a small tripod (Manfrotto BeFree), a cheap light pad from Amazon and a negative holder from an old enlarger. I cut the first strip off and stick it in the scanner and I can have the other 5 strips cut before the first frame is scanned. Also quality is better than monst consumer level flatbed scanners. Nov 27, 2024 · You want to scan a lot of film: the 8200i SE is laborious to use, the Epson or Kodaks below are faster automated ways to scan huge collections of 35mm film. Never thought it was time consuming. Also, a scanner can have a broad dynamic range that doesn't include properly exposed bright highlights in positive film. Hi to you all, I wish to purchase a 35mm negative scanner without going OTT with the price. Then I remembered my old darkroom days, went on ebay a found several negative holders for an enlarger, fairly inexpensive and if you are only doing 35mm you only need one ($10). In that case, I'd get an old Nikon Coolscan. 8 macro. r/Darkroom is Reddit's best place for discussions on film developing, printing, toning and hand-coloring prints, darkroom techniques, equipment and more. Other than that, they look like a great deal. Assuming you're talking about a regular film scanner and not a drum scanner, anything past 3600 is kind of useless unless you really know what you're doing Looking to scan 35mm negatives at home from time to time and looking for any recommendations for any scanners I should look into. Jack of all trades, master of none. But you can scan 35mm color and black-and-white negatives. The v600 or above epson scanners are good. I'd avoid the cheap ones that sell for about $100 or less. You might wish to consider a dedicated 35mm film scanner if there is a significant amount of 35mm film that you need to scan. Flatbed scanners are not recommended for 35mm negatives. Got some negatives back from the lab and decided to scan them myself and compare to the lab scans. Since I already had a Sony A7 and a vintage macro lens, I tried camera scanning but it was such a tedious process. 8x10 actually curls less than 4x5 film, and the anti newton glass won't prevent all Newton rings, as I don't think the scanner glass is anti newton. Hi. Nov 25, 2021 · I scan using the native Canon software and simply put, the results match the negatives. Pulling them into lightroom and applying negative lab pro to it is extremely enjoyable. A high end 35mm scanner like the the Prime Film XAS can scan at a true optical quality of almost 30 megapixels. Apart from scanning in the 3 primary colours, it also scans in infrared. As I look forward to a new era of home processing (these photos are from my second attempt at c-41 color processing, scanned with my old film scanner), I am in need of a film scanner upgrade. The Blackmagic Cintel, which is a modern scanner for use in 35mm cine scanning is a Bayer scanner. Can anyone recommend a scanner capable of or designed for taking high resolution copies of 35mm developed negatives to import into Lightroom? I don't want to spend a fortune, but obviously would prefer a high resolution image. The only issue I have with those Plustek scanners is that they don't have glass-plate negative holders. I make a contact sheet with my flatbed scanner and then choose which ones to scan at higher resolution The more average person sends it off to either a mini-lab scanner or a warehouse in india with hundreds of low paid workers on Coolscan 9000s. Even the cheaper dedicated film scanners can really be hit and miss, and high end dedicated film scanners can cost you an arm and a leg. I am new to film photography, but I do know what I 15 votes, 26 comments. EDIT: Forgot to mention that my budget is around $100-400 Thanks, Faffing about with flat-bed scanners is always a pain. I was facing the same decision, needing a way to scan my black and white negatives. Help with VueScan + 35mm negatives + v500 Epson scanner . Chromogenic B&W films like Ilford XP2 have considerably less acutely visible grain so they will usually tolerate extreme enlargement better than silver halide B&W films. If the files are going to web, 600 dpi or so is plenty for 35mm. I've seen many reviews of the V series and few of them seem to impress me. And the companion Silverfast software gives you more control over the digital version. They will give you several times more resolution than a flatbed scanner. Let me tell you, you don't want to be using a flatbed for anything that doesn't necessitate it. A flatbad scanner gives you the most options and delivers great quality for medium format and above. And I wouldn’t buy anything lower end than a v700 or v800 for that reason, as well as the fact that the v600 simply lacks effective resolution. Other option is to use DSLR scanning, which is my current way of scanning any kind of negatives. I’ve had Plustek before. I scan mostly raw with no ICE or any other enhancing tech and edit in Lightroom after. Installed the software from the CD on a Windows XP and a Windows 10. V600. I personally have the XES because I don’t need high quality scans of every picture on a roll, most of them are shit usually. (Plustek, Reflecta) I won't go into all my eight scanners (pakon, minolta scan dual iv, epson v700, coolscan 8000, coolscan V ED, Wolverine 35mm, brand x120 scanner) but i will talk about the Minolta Scan Dual IV. I feel a good 4000dpi film scanner is the easiest route, but these things are getting long in the tooth. They're easier to use and most models return superior quality. Another good thing with flatbed scanners is that they can also be used to scan other items like documents, printed photographs, and other non-transparent items. I know nothing about Plustek or Epson scanners. Just work with what sharpening you can in the computer. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. Any lighter areas are scratches, any dark areas are dust/dirt. Edit: Also note that my scanner also came with a plastic thingy to hold medium format negs (120 film), slides, and 35mm film. They do a better job at 35mm than the flatbeds if you want to print larger, but they are slower, one frame at a time. Reddit’s proposed changes make the site inaccessible to these users. I think each has 6 frames per strip (I may be off a frame or two) which would let you scan 18 frames or so at a time. using a microscope, you can still see detail that the drum scanner can't resolve, even when scanning at 4000 or 8000 DPI settings. A lot of people like the plustek but the pacific image scanners are ranked higher. Scan at the highest optical setting on the scanner. I scan historic photos with an epson V750 scanner for a cultural institution; indeed, I'm doing it right now. I've used dedicated film scanners, flatbed scanners, and DSLR cameras. caatisg enk rfbmzw nuj pqrtz lntvgb zrtg gthla jysrhnsy nmbasv